Pages

Sunday, January 6, 2008

~ the world bag

The loneliness of objects. Their secret lives’ William Gibson.

However banal an object – and few, if any, objects are as banal as this – the human imagination will find a way to use it creatively, to invest it with meaning.


Above, we see Bree modelling an outfit inspired by the breathtaking triviality of the Stripy Bag. Below, the bag elaborately transformed for the market’s higher end [by an artisan from South Melbourne]



Since the mid-eighties, I have been interested in the stripy bag. Lured by the sheer scope of its banality. Fascinated by its everpresence – as the bag. almost certainly, has penetrated every country on this Earth. It has become iconic in the hands and on the backs of refugees. It is a symbol of the uprooted and the dispossessed - and yet there is one, almost definitely, in every second house on the planet.

A few years ago, I tried to write an article on the stripy bag, but I could find out pretty well nothing about it. Befitting, really. Instead, I wrote a short monologue for the theatre which I’ve performed a number of times since…

*

We are the slaves of objects. We require them for comfort, safety, defence, cleanliness, pleasure, for the sense of self-worth, for influence and for money

We work for them. Play for them. Die for them. We use objects to co-ordinate... other objects. We infuse them with meaning.

We see our future selves in the reaching hands of an infant - whom no amount of objects will satisfy.

We are contingent on them. And they on us. They find us in the crowd and offer themselves up, they lodge themselves in the tissue of our lives, they insinuate themselves into our conversations, they hijack our thoughts.

It is simple and understood. Objects are important. They are pivotal to our existence.

I, myself, am unnaturally adhesive to objects. They swarm about me like stinging insects. I hear their emanations, like... remote machinery. They gather in my house and poison my flow. They nourish and cosset me. They starve and torment me. They accumulate to form the compost from which I assemble my lifestyle...

Some objects are simple, others are fantastically elaborate. Some barely change over time, others are modified. Some are ugly but functional, others we place in museums or galleries. Some are discontinued, while others become perennial favourites. Some have intrinsic value. Some are disposable. Some are well-documented, ruminated upon, the subject of commentaries, technical manuals, reviews, but some...

Some cast no shadow. They are ignored, utterly. They are a booming silence that cries its absence to the world.

The object to which I draw your attention is beneath the cloth.

This is an object that slips under the guard of culture and taste. It seems not to even have a commonly agreed-upon name, yet has the kind of product-recognition that would ramp the blood-pressure of any marketing executive.

In this object, we find a concentrated banality of which we should beware - recalling that evil, in its essence, is banal.

Are you curious? Don’t be. Be the opposite of curious. Be disappointed.

If you’ve never seen one of these before, I’m very sorry for bringing it to your attention.

As near as I can place it, the year is 1983. The place China: ancient nation which gave us Rocketry, Chess, Umbrellas and wheelbarrows has refocused its inventive skills. In our time it is the empire of cheap plastic artifacts, disgorging in torrents. An endless landscape dotted with factories, each one injection moulding or thermoforming a different plastic doo-dad or widget to fill the $2 shops of this world.

1983. Woven polypropylene. A material made by weaving polypropylene tapes to form a lightweight breathable fabric. Bags of this material are sturdy, recyclable, suitable for grains, pet food, minerals and other products, and offer superior protection from moisture, mildew and pests.

I have tried to learn more, but... there is no literature on the subject. I have been able to chip barely a single fact off the great wall of silence.

Considered guesses are all I can offer. 1983. Has the material recently been invented? Has a new development facilitated cheap large-scale production?

Was a middle-echelon employee of a large Plastics Concern doing his laundry, when he had a sudden crystal clear insight into the needs of humans on Earth.

Did he make a little sketch on the back of a consignment form?

But... why the stripes?

And why did he choose red blue and white?

Are they auspicious colours? Used in the flags of France, America, Russia, the UK, Australia. Or are they just the cheapest dyes?

Only he could tell us and today he is - of course - unavailable, a billionaire cloistered in his Ming Dynasty style palace, meditating upon golden carp and chrysanthemums as Stygian extruders churn in the valley below.

*

Wherever shopping is done. Where laundry is done. Where bag ladies heft their meagre possessions. Where asylum-seekers mill in the holds of fishing vessels; there you will find them.

The bag proliferates, as if on the wave of a massive, yet invisible, advertising campaign -

With no saturation point in sight...

And tell me, do we really have a choice? Are its cheapness, usefulness and ready availability too much for us to resist? You,who ordinarily would never purchase such a bag. How many of you have been forced, by some annoying circumstance, to buy one?

I doubt if anyone, anywhere has ever really made a conscious decision to possess such a thing, yet, inexorably, the bag ekes its way into our lives. Near to immortal, they gather in carports and sheds. With each passing year we own more and more of these bags, sometimes without ever having purchased one

Yes, it is hard to throw out a bag.

But what does it signify that we all share this bag? It spans religious, cultural and monetary divides. It is truly ecumenical - but is it something on which to build a more harmonious world?

No, of course not.

If you haven’t already thought through the implications... of this bag.

Now is the time. Save yourselves. The news is bad.

Outrage at the spread of McDonald’s on the bow-wave of US cultural Imperialism. Outrage at the global Arms trade, taking the spears from the hands of tribesmen and replacing them with AK-47s...

But for the bag... ?

And its silent global conquest?

No comment. Neither in the Age nor the Herald Sun. No mention in the ‘Socialist Worker’ or the ‘Advocate’. Not a peep from S11. Nothing.

But humans often have interesting reactions to nothing.

It lurks stagnantly beneath the public imagination. It slithers beneath the currents of fashion. The bag has no style. Cannot be pinned down to a period or decade. When a terrorist wants to plant a bomb, this is the bag of choice.

Such things - omnipresent, yet impenetrable to research - can provide fertile ground for conspiracy theorists.

1983. Threatened by a global labour shortage, The Gnomes of Zurich identified a huge labour-pool in the Third World. But these potential workers were settled and unwilling to embark upon the difficult process of moving. Higher wages were out of the question, so the powers-that-be developed and distributed a spacious durable product in which all a indigent’s worldly goods could be stored. Suddenly, a cheap highly mobile workforce was available to the world economy..

And who’s to say it isn’t true?

Twenty years the bag has been with us. It is now produced in Iran, Indonesia, Thailand and India as well as China. It is available in a range of sizes and can be found in different patterns. But has it really changed in that time? No. A stable presence in our lives, unnoteworthy in all its aspects.

But subjectively, things have been happening.

When we use an object, a little of ourselves rubs off, and a little of it rubs off on us. A thousand fleeting contacts, glimpses, shared moments. We form associations. An object begins to give off a distinct emotional scent. It is different for everyone, but...

What do you feel when you look at the bag?

For me, it generates a kind of sucking energy that weakens me at the root. If it is a bad day, the bag can make me hate who I am.

It degrades any landscape on which it is imposed. Yet, annoyingly, the eye is drawn to it. Too late, you realise - your day has been... cheapened. And it trivialises what it contains. And it’s always full.

In contemplating this bag, I experience a sudden anxiety, a vertigo, a dream-falling. Like dried egg filtering my vision of the world. Leering faces forming in the dust of my previous selves. Bad decisions clinging like cobwebs to my clothes. All the useless things, the dead-ends, the endless repetitions of mistakes. It trawls up memories of all the tired pointless things that have dogged me all my life. Suddenly they are what defines me.

At once, the barrier between my daily existence and the Void becomes... transparent - and I know somehow that everything I do, have ever done, amounts to a towering zero.

Yes! Bags are useful. They help us organise and compartmentalise. But this bag takes more than it gives. Fresh from the factory, it is an invitation to squalor. A call to Despair. An portent of the End Times.

It symbolises failure, the utter exhaustion of the imagination. If you can: Don’t abide it. Don’t notice it. Don’t recognise it. Don’t use it.

It is a quietly spoken profanity. Look closely. There is nothing there. It is the end of the universe. In a bag.

Stumble Upon Toolbar DiggIt!

Saturday, January 5, 2008

~ the emperor’s new road toll

Many years ago, somebody told me that the road toll over the Christmas/New Year period is really not much worse than for any other two week period of the year.

It was an annoying scrap of information that has stuck with me, and bugged me, because I’ve never been sure if it’s true or not. Then, with all the Christmas road warnings, the breathless reporting of the first Christmas fatality, the grieving families, the stern editorials … I begin to forget...

But today, I was thinking about it. I read that Victoria’s C/NY road toll was a ‘sickening’ 17, two more than last year’. [Elsewhere I read that last year’s toll was 16. This may be due to a discrepancy in reporting procedures between state and national.]

Anyway, I decided to do the maths.

Let’s say 16 people died in the C/NY period of 2006/7, a period of 14 days. The year before it was 12.

The average for ANY two weeks of 2006 was 12.88 [and would be similar for any of the last few years]. So, in the last two periods it has been 3 and 2 deaths above average. In 2005/6 it was 1 below.

Put another way – the daily average of road fatalities is 0.92. During the 2006/7 holiday period it was 1.1. 2005/6 = 0.86 2007/8 = 1.21

I am no statistician, but you could hardly call this a horrifying spike.

Yet still we hear of ‘the road carnage that usually takes place over the Christmas holiday’, ‘the festive-season toll count’, the ‘appalling statistics’. That we have 'no new weapons to fight the Christmas road carnage’.

And, if there is more traffic on the road during this period, as one constantly hears, would this not bring the numbers even closer to average? [Personally, I think there’s less traffic, but that’s just my experience.]

Why do the authorities campaign so heavily and the media follow along so enthusiastically? Have they forgotten that it’s not too much different from any other period? Did they ever know?

Could there be a reason that is independent of the figures?

Perhaps it lies in the historical toll for the period?

Or with a media desperate for stories in a slow period? Accidents do form a large part of holiday news bulletins. There’s good copy in a suffering family on Christmas day …

Perhaps the powers that be believe it is a time for meditating on road safety so instead of press releases and sober awareness campaigns, they embark upon a massive nationwide hoax…

Whatever the reason, I’ll trust it is for the public good - but I’ll bet you the man in the streets believes the toll to be a lot higher than it in fact is. And an act of public deception by authorities is never a good thing. Especially if it is invoking of fear …

It still frustrates me. Any ideas?

Stumble Upon Toolbar DiggIt!

Thursday, January 3, 2008

* 10 March 1981 10.30pm

I am going to move. Craig and Christine are interested in taking over my flat.

I found a pidgeon walking on the street which died in my care a day later.

The ears played disappointingly on their ‘Return Peformance’. A crowd of 300. More than doubles our previous effort …

*

The only thing I can say about this is: hadn’t I heard that pidgeons are the rats of the sky?

Stumble Upon Toolbar DiggIt!

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

~ the red man

Nicholas the Byzantine – destined to become a Saint and enter heaven – stared intently into a crystal globe which sat exposed upon the dark red velvet cloth in which it had been wrapped. At his shoulder stood the celebrated scryer, John Dee, who had travelled from London for this consultation.

- Do not concentrate, he said. Observe the sphere as you would observe your face in the mirror. Idly. Casually. Do not force your attention upon it.

- This act may be sinful, Doctor.

- Please, spare all your thoughts for the glass.

- You are thought to be an enemy of the Church.

- Will you waste my time, now that I am here?

Nicholas sighed. His gaze strayed from the globe, then flicked back suddenly, catching signs of movement, a swirling fog ... a miasma of queer potentials… Quickly, he scanned his surroundings. There was no chance that it was a reflection.

- What do you see? asked the scryer, smiling.

A cloudy mass, roiling ... Disturbing contours… Elusive shapes, dissolving even before they had taken form.

- Be calm now.

As clear as day, a figure was standing in the glass, staring directly back at Nicholas as if, indeed, he was regarding his image in the mirror. It’s face was lined and old. It wore a long white beard. Its eyes bore a hint of amusement… and kindness …

- A daemon, whispered Nicholas, breathlessly. I should never have …

- Hold! It is no daemon.

Dee furrowed his brow. He considered the grotesque sprite. It was robed in common bright red, possibly amaranth. Its clothes were trimmed with something that might have been fur. Perhaps of the mink, thought Dee, or the rabbit …

Nicholas felt sweat running down from his armpits. He longed to divest himself of his ecclesiastical garments, but dared not in the company of this man.

- Sight is but one of the senses, instructed Dee. Use it as your base to explore sounds, scents … To see inside the mind of this apparition. To deduce its meaning.

- Is it ... a man?

- I have read it in the gases. Sigils form in their ebb and flow. Dee paused. I believe this is your future.

Nicholas stared uncomprehendingly. The extraordinary homunculus redirected its attention to a vast sleigh of a design used in Lapland and the far Northern reaches. He saw eight reindeer bridled. Handsome looking beasts, but for one, whose nose burned red as if there was a fire in its very flesh.

- How? This cannot be our world. Do you see the imps? Their wicked little smiles? I am in the imagination of a village witch.

The red figure was bowed beneath the weight of an enormous sack, which he unloaded into the cargo space of the sleigh with the assistance of his ‘imps’ - their ears large and cuspidate, their martial uniforms a bilious shade of green.

Nicholas caught sight of what could only have been treasure: boxes of many shapes and sizes, wrapped in magnificent materials that gleamed beguilingly in the pale winter sun.

- base greed.. avarice … mumbled Nicholas, his lips sour.

- Of all people, you should know that only the corporeal existence is terminated by death. What you may be seeing is your soul …

- Then my soul has passed into Hell.

- Who of us can claim to understand the aethereal realms? asked Dee, himself wholly mystified by the vision. He struggled for understanding. If one’s memory is preserved in the minds of people – as I am certain yours will be, Your Worship – then may we not be witnessing…. a form of incorporeality independent of the Divinity, one that endures in the memory of men …

Dee’s voice faded from Nicholas’ awareness. Fascinated, and against his better judgement, he let himself be drawn further into the phantom world.

The bearded fat man in his tight red costume flew across a broad ocean lit by starlight. Ahead, appearing across the horizon, was a vast city spangled with light; burning so fiercely as if to abolish the very notion of darkness. And there were golden, mirrored towers that reached towards the clouds …

Is this heaven? Nicholas asked himself.

To his consternation, the spectre divided in two, in four, in eight. Before Nicholas could blink, there were thousands of red men diving towards the city with clear intent. Some, to his amazement, squeezed themselves down chimneys and feasted on cold meats and brandy. In each of these houses was a small tree weighed down by voluptuous baubles and flashing tinsels that might have graced the vestments of the Pope himself.

Before leaving, the red men emptied a sack of breathtaking abundance at the base of the tree.

Other red men appeared in vast, alien market places, where there were no rats or fleas, nor the stench of sludge pits; where merchants displayed luxuries of mysterious manufacture and utility - which people, in bewildering attire, fought amongst themselves to obtain. Here the red men would seek to lure children from the crowd - sometimes with the assistance of writhing harlots - to who they would dispense gifts from their bulging sacks.

A form of conditioning? mused Nicholas.

Not always did the red man appear in physical form. Sometimes its likeness could be seen on boxes, in which captive universes were rendered into two dimensions. The image appeared also in grossly illuminated manuscripts, enlarged massively on walls, even drawn in light – but always in association with wondrous treasures.

The symbolism was not lost on Nicholas. These treasures, despite their gorgeous appearance, had no value. For most items, Nicholas could not even discern a purpose. They were mirages. Bait. Tools to distil the low emotions from the hearts of God’s people. Before his very eyes he had seen innocents openly educated in the mortal sins of Greed and Avarice. The red men brought selfishness and venal desire to all - and sometimes, sadly, a fear that their gifts may not be obtained.

Always, the infernal red men travelled beneath the orison of good cheer, giving and – appallingly – the Christ-Child’s birth in Bethlehem. Always, they carried irresistible treasures in their sacks - luring, tantalising, wrenching the soul free of its innate goodness

He had observed negotiations between the red man and a
powerful guild of merchants. A contract was drawn, allowing them freedom to associate their popular brown beverage with the red man's name and reputation. It was here, he learned, that the horrific red and white apparel had its genesis

As Dee covered the glass, Nicholas fought to control his horror.

- Thank you very much, Doctor, he said in a tremulous voice.

- My pleasure, said Dee. I hope you… were satisfied? That you learnt something of use?

- Of use? Tell me, esteemed Doctor, is it useful to know that in the future you will join hands with Lucifer and become his regent on Earth?

[Dysthymiac sparked this off]

Stumble Upon Toolbar DiggIt!

Stumble Upon Toolbar DiggIt!