Brutal arch-terrorist David Hicks today will seek to further undermine the Australian nation by leeching hard earned tax-money from its citizens …
In truth … My wife claims to have seen the headline ‘Hicks To Go On Dole’ scrolling past the bottom of the screen when she was watching the Channel Nine morning show today.
All it took was his father, or lawyer, to mention that he had an appointment at Centrelink. That and the Channel Nine sensibility.
I say he deserves a lot more than the dole for what his nation allowed him to suffer.
5 comments:
He committed a criminal act.
He spent SIX YEARS in gaol , a fair cop for the deed.
What more does the hypocritical Australian media want from him?
It does not matter what he does next, the media will hound him and his employer so they can beat-up luridity for the mindless masses.
Later in the day, he was being discussed somewhere ... i heard an uncompassionate voice spit, 'In this country we have a thing called mutual obligation
umm.. didn't this guy reject his Australian roots?
change his name to mohamed dawoo (or something similar)
He should think himself lucky the americans thought his worthy enough to offer a reward for him else he would probably be dead in afghanistan as the guys who captured him would have just killed him as an enemy combatant....
maybe he should have been released where he was captured and make his own way back to the country (and his ex partner and kids he had deserted back home - the non Australian tying to do - did he send back any money for maintenace for his own kids??) that he had deserted...
you know, not all Australians think he is so wonderful
ALbert
Australia
elberto@telstra.com
Hey, don't get me wrong. I've nothing positive to say about the guy himself. From the available evidence he seems to have been a naive misguided adventurer, possibly of limited intelligence.
My problem is with what was done to him - and with Australia not looking after its own [he was a citizen, regardless of anything]
And you could be right, the US might have saved his life by capturing him - but did they need to treat a simpleton like an arch terrorist?
Here's a comment which my technical mismanagement may have caused to disappear ... Albert raises some pertinent points ...
I see what you mean as many others (well the outspoken ones..) seem to think the same way but I guess I don't agree - he should be willing to stand or fall for what he believed in.
He was lucky to be kept in a protected place for all those years and I don't think it cost him anything (monetarily..) although he was severely restricted in his liberty but that was the risk he took and he ... lost and doesn't seem willing to take responsibility for his actions (he is a free man... you may disagree but he is back home on Australian soil and able to get back on the rock and roll (what they used to call the dole years ago...)
He was happy to say goodbye to Australia an dour values and now he is more than happy that we are protecting him ...
sigh...
I don't think you can leave Islam without being killed though ... we shall see in the weeks to come....
ok I will stop preaching I guess....
It is pretty amusing all this stuff about him but I have no sympathy for the man nor his father - but I guess his father did succeed in getting media attention and it wont be the last time someone uses those tactics (not sure what I would do in that situation - either being david or terry - man ... when do you write off your son and what does he have to do to be lost to his father?
sorry. Thinking a lot on that as I worked in a mine till month ago and one of the guys there bashed an electrician i town with an iron bar over nothing - as I was friends with them both but I actually liked the electrician.. hmmn... seems my grammar leaves something to be desired...lol).
anyhow thanks for your email and I guess I went off on a rant - just had pizza and a cup of tea (what vile chemicals have I just put into my system?)
Post a Comment